Quote:
Originally Posted by Golfingbear  Aw BM you are breaking my heart. I do read what's posted however, I've noticed 90% of the posts are made by approximateldy 23 people. My phone has rang off the hook with people who are not happy with where we stand on Security and what the future looks like. |
Exactly how many different people made your "phone ring of the hook"? Was it 10, 20, 30? Why do the voices on here count for less than if we picked up the phone?
Quote:
|
Perhaps some of you have forgotten the 34 car break-in we had in a two week period a couple months ago. I know this isn't Oak Park however my phone calls tell me people want the CC&R's enforced and they want to know their property is safe.
|
I haven't forgotten, but even if we had 10 security guards on patrol, these things will happen.
Why would we need a outside security agency for this?
Quote:
|
I'm just looking for ways to comply with these request. If the membership doesn't like what we come up with in Non-Arc rules they have the right and chance to speak their mind when these rules go out for public comments. What amazes me is all the hulabaloo over these possible rules before any of you have even seen them.
|
I made no mention of any of the new proposed non-arch rules, I will address that when I see what you have to offer.
Quote:
|
Don't I read where you are always asking Lisa T. to provide you with facts? That being the case maybe you should hear the facts before you judge me.
|
I'm going by what I've heard you say, at the CSD meeting in May and the quotes from you in the lastest RM.com story. I'm judging you on your own statements.
Quote:
|
The BOD is trying to be part of the solution. Jumping on our case before the facts are presented is being part of the problem!!!!!!!!!!!
|
No one is jumping on the BOD's case, I was addressing your comments. If what I hear from you and read as your quotes is what I see as being done to adress the "crime problem", do I not have the right to question why? Where your information is coming from? What your reasoning behind the proposed decisions your making? I'm looking for answers as to why you think we need to spend RMA money on an outside security agency, and what your justification for that is. Because I can't see any.
And last but not least, thanks for replying. I do appreciate it.